David Klinghoffer
If you get canceled, like paleontologist Gunter Bechly, where do you go?
An ID book for young people?
Will “science” please stand down?
Apologies for displaying an African man in a Bronx Zoo monkey house conveniently leave out the Darwinian motivation
Does Darwinism help produce anarchic nihilism?
David Klinghoffer: Evolutionary thinking in a “state of decadence”
A Darwin snark for a new Nobelist
Does Darwinism not matter the way it used to?
David Klinghoffer: Racism is integral to Darwinian thinking, “like an irremediable birth defect”
“Race realism” (Darwinian racism) pops up again: the John Derbyshire commemorative edition
“Rube-Bait”: Kevin Williamson vs. David Klinghoffer: Round 3
“Rube-Bait”: Kevin Williamson vs. David Klinghoffer: Round 2
Recently, we covered Evolution News and Science Today editor David Klinghoffer’s response to a sneer by Kevin Williamson against ID at National Review (where Klinghoffer used to work, incidentally). Klinghoffer cited a number of respectable thinkers who have held Darwinism in little esteem—which led to our publishing a separate and different long list of such thinkers here at Uncommon Descent. Meanwhile, Williamson replied to Klinghoffer (“Irreducible Perplexity”), who fired back: Here’s what is missing: serious public debate. Telling scientists to “slug it out” in professional journals and not try to persuade others is like asking a free-market advocate to persuade his Marxist colleagues before he dares offer his case to the public. What makes Kevin think entrenched Darwinists are willing Read More ›
Intelligent design as “rube-bait” and David Klinghoffer’s response
Fake news on the ID controversy still includes babies with tails
Last year, David Klinghoffer offered some thoughts on fake news about controversies in evolution in popular media that bear repeating: The supposedly objective investigative news site ProPublica hit all of them — codes, creationism, Kitzmiller v. Dover — in a recent article, going after then-Education Secretary nominee Betsy DeVos, who had mentioned “critical thinking” in her appointment hearing. When a colleague and I challenged their reporting, focusing on a distortion of our education policy that could be verified by published documents on our website, an editor brushed us off, claiming it came down to a “matter of opinion and debate, not fact.” I’ve documented my correspondence with the editor, which I found very revealing. I might have let it drop Read More ›