Even cancer cells show more design than we might expect
Francis Collins finally awarded the Templeton Prize
Brian Miller vs. Jeremy England, Round 2
A pi test of Einstein’s theory of general relativity
Now we talk of a “Neanderthal Renaissance”?
Excerpt from new ID book: Evolution and Intelligent Design in a Nutshell
Does evolution “choose”?
A striking admission that Michael Behe was right
Some remarkable admissions in a Current Biology editorial
Doctor Ivette Lozano from Dallas, Texas on treating patients with HCQ Cocktails
Inimitable: Food for thought. U/D: When it reaches the pharmacy . . . U/D May 19, another Lozano interview: And, oh yes, breaking 1: Mr Trump is praising — yes, I am NOT using, “touting” — a promising vaccination. Announcement by the firm, here. Breaking, no 2, courtesy Daily Mail as usual: Of course, the now standard, it’s risky is in the subheads. U/D: Video: Compare our Texas Doctor’s remarks. And then, there is the latest from Dr Raoult: Whose report do you believe, why? END
Orthomyxo Schools Upright Biped
Several times now Orthomyxo has sneered at the idea that the genetic code is anything more than “chemical reactions.” In an exchange with Upright Biped, UB defended the position that the code, while certainly operating through chemical reactions, is just as certainly governed by a staggeringly complex semiotic information system. We pick up the debate with UB responding to Ortho by outlining how the system works: I told you the critical physical condition of the system (described as such in the literature) that allows the system to function as it does, in a material universe determined by inexorable physical law. The gene system must have the physical freedom to specify itseIf, as well as any variation of itself. In case Read More ›