At The Scientist: No, we did not kill off the Neanderthals but maybe we helped
Question for readers: In a world where horizontal gene transfer is an important force, what becomes of Dawkins’s Selfish Gene?
The bacterial flagellar hook as a universal joint
So then maybe we ARE privileged observers
Once upon a time, scientists were allowed to think that Darwin might be wrong
EG vs objective reality (pivoting on distinct identity)
In a current thread frequent objector EG comments — and yes, I am catching up: KF and others talk about “objective” as being something that is unchangeable. For example, homosexuality is objectively wrong. Always was, always will be. This doesn’t change with the times. But you argue that my preference of ice cream flavor is also objectively true. If my preference for ice cream is objective, and changeable, then other objective things, like moral values, are also changeable. Nope. For one, what I have said about objectivity (or rather, what Wikipedia has been forced to admit against obvious ideological inclination) is: Objectivity is a philosophical concept of being true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination. A Read More ›
In this version, we did NOT kill off the Neanderthals
Researchers: Animal embryos evolved before animals
Those Neanderthals were always too dumb to know how dumb we needed them to be
Talk about hope springing eternal: 2020 for our history-making alien life find?
Some dinos replaced their teeth multiple times a year
Claim: Many types of human were kayoed in the Sixth Great Extinction
Sev and Ed Respond to Upright Biped (and Fail Spectacularly)
Ed George asserted that morality is based on societal consensus. Upright Biped utterly demolished that argument. See here. Seversky and Ed tried to respond to UB’s arguments. Let’s start with Sev: I, like everyone else here, would also want [the rape] to stop. Why? I should not have to say this but it is because we can imagine her suffering and know that it is not something we would like to experience nor would we want to see it inflicted on anyone else. It’s called empathy and its derived principle of the Golden Rule which, in my view, is more than sufficient grounds for morality. This is a muddled mashup of two of the materialists’ favorite dodges. First Sev appeals Read More ›