Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Topic

Steve Meyer

Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
February 12, 2023
Categorized
Fine tuning, Fine-timing
Tagged
, , , ,

Uploaded: By Design: Behe, Lennox, and Meyer on the Evidence for a Creator

Denyse O'Leary
February 12, 2023
Fine tuning, Fine-timing
Hoover Institution: “Michael Behe, John Lennox, and Steven Meyer are three of the leading voices in science and academia on the case for an intelligent designer of the universe and everything in it (including us). Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
August 20, 2022
Categorized
Fine tuning, Intelligent Design
Tagged
, , , ,

At Mind Matters News: Has a superintellect monkeyed with our universe’s physics?

Denyse O'Leary
August 20, 2022
Fine tuning, Intelligent Design
Takehome: It got worse for Hoyle: To form carbon at all, gravitational forces must be balanced just right with the electromagnetic forces. That’s just the start… Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
July 3, 2022
Categorized
Books of interest, Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
Tagged
, , ,

At Socrates in the City: Eric Metaxas and Stephen Meyer Tackle Science and God

Denyse O'Leary
July 3, 2022
Books of interest, Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
Meyer is author of "The Return of the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific Discoveries that Reveal the Mind Behind the Universe." Eric Metaxas is a radio talk show host and author of Is Atheism Dead? Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
April 3, 2022
Categorized
Intelligent Design, Origin Of Life
Tagged
, , ,

Steve Meyer on whether extraterrestrials created life, as opposed to an intelligence outside nature

Denyse O'Leary
April 3, 2022
Intelligent Design, Origin Of Life
"Yet those who propose panspermia have not explained, or even seriously grappled with, the problem of the origin of specified biological information." - Meyer No, but they don't need to, do they? Their seamless blend of science fiction and non-fiction would be rudely interrupted by needless complexities in the plot... Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
April 3, 2022
Categorized
Cosmology, Fine tuning, Intelligent Design, Multiverse
Tagged
, , ,

Steve Meyer on why a supposed multiverse is no answer to the extreme fine-tuning of our universe

Denyse O'Leary
April 3, 2022
Cosmology, Fine tuning, Intelligent Design, Multiverse
Meyer on multiverse cosmologists: "The speculative cosmologies (such as inflationary cosmology and string theory) they propose for generating alternative universes invariably invoke mechanisms that themselves require fine-tuning, thus begging the question as to the origin of that prior fine-tuning." Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
March 24, 2022
Categorized
Fine tuning, Intelligent Design
Tagged
, ,

Fine tuning of the universe: “Who Ya Gonna Believe Me or Your Own Eyes?”

Denyse O'Leary
March 24, 2022
Fine tuning, Intelligent Design
So Larry Krauss argues “cosmological fine-tuning does not provide evidence of intelligent design, but instead, ‘the illusion of intelligent design.’” Isn’t that a misuse of the concept of illusion? Doesn’t it amount to saying, Who Ya Gonna Believe Me or Your Own Eyes? Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
March 20, 2022
Categorized
Atheism, Culture, Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
Tagged
, , , , ,

Noted at Hillfaith: Atheists’ books show that God must exist

Denyse O'Leary
March 20, 2022
Atheism, Culture, Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
They couldn't have written them without intelligent design of the universe. The blog also notes the impact of Steve Meyer's book, Return of the God Hypothesis, which seems to be giving the Darwinian materialist atheists some serious competition. Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
December 7, 2021
Categorized
Books of interest, Intelligent Design
Tagged
, , ,

At Claremont Review of Books: “The God Hypothesis should be considered as a possible explanation for our universe.”

Denyse O'Leary
December 7, 2021
Books of interest, Intelligent Design
Reviewer: Meyer argues that the materialist assumption now poses an obstruction to understanding, compelling scientists to embrace implausible and untestable hypotheses as a defense against the God hypothesis... But Gelernter and Nagel make a good case that religious zealotry, and a refusal to debate the facts honestly, now characterize Meyer’s opponents more than they do Meyer and his supporters. Read More ›